Why the study?
Do multivariate clinical models predict incident cardiovascular disease better than oral glucose tolerance tests in adults without known diabetes or CVD?
Population
4,257 adults, 25-64 years of age, free of both cardiovascular disease and known diabetes at baseline, from…
Comparison
Multivariate models incorporating commonly… vs Oral glucose tolerance tests / 2-h plasma glucose
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
7-8 years
Authors
Loading...
Standard clinical variables may outperform glucose testing for CVD prediction in nondiabetics; hypothesis-generating for updated risk models pending validation.
Do multivariate clinical models predict incident cardiovascular disease better than oral glucose tolerance tests in adults without known diabetes or CVD?
Standard clinical variables predict future cardiovascular disease better than oral glucose tolerance tests in individuals without known diabetes.
Stern et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: