Why the study?
Does 8 weeks of high-intensity exercise training improve functional sympatholysis in young and older habitually active men?
Does 8 weeks of high-intensity exercise training improve functional sympatholysis in young and older habitually active men?
High-intensity exercise training improves functional sympatholysis in young but not older habitually active men, suggesting that improving sympatholytic capacity by training may be a slower process in aged individuals.
High-intensity training may enhance functional sympatholysis across ages; leaves open effects in sedentary or diseased populations.
The ability of contracting skeletal muscle to attenuate sympathetic vasoconstriction during exercise, termed functional sympatholysis, can be improved by exercise training. However, to what extent age affects functional sympatholysis is unclear. Thus, this study examined the effect of 8 weeks of high-intensity exercise training on α-adrenergic responsiveness at rest and on functional sympatholysis in a group of young (n = 15; 25 ± 1 years) and older (n = 15; 72 ± 1 years) habitually active, healthy male subjects. Before and after the exercise training, all subjects participated in an experimental day in which leg hemodynamics and venous plasma norepinephrine were assessed at rest and during knee-extensor exercise without and with tyramine infusion. The results of the study show that before exercise training, the young and older subjects had similar α-adrenergic responsiveness at rest and similar incomplete functional sympatholysis during knee-extensor exercise. Exercise training resulted in a reduction in α-adrenergic responsiveness at rest in both groups, whereas functional sympatholysis was improved in the young group only. The improvement in functional sympatholysis in the young but not the older subjects despite a reduced α-adrenergic responsiveness at rest suggests that improving sympatholytic capacity by training may be a slower process in aged than in young men.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piil et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: