Key result
Higher CAD-RADS scores link to ~19.1-fold higher 5-year MI risk.
RCT (n=1,769)
Randomized controlled trial (post-hoc analysis of SCOT-HEART)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the prognostic implications of standardized reporting systems for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and coronary artery calcium scores (CACS) in patients with stable chest pain. BACKGROUND: The Coronary Artery Disease Reporting And Data System (CAD-RADS) and Coronary Artery Calcium - Data and Reporting System (CAC-DRS) aim to improve communication of CACS and CCTA results, but its influence on prognostication is unknown. METHODS: Images from 1769 patients who underwent CCTA as part of the Scottish Computed Tomography of the HEART (SCOT-HEART) multi-center randomized controlled trial were assessed. CACS were classified as CAC-DRS 0 to 3 based on Agatston scores. CCTA were classified as CAD-RADS 0 to 5 based on the most clinically relevant finding per patient. The primary outcome was the five-year events of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 58 ± 10 years and 56% were male. CAC-DRS 0, 1, 2 and 3 occurred in 642 (36%), 510 (29%), 239 (14%) and 379 (21%) patients respectively. CAD-RADS 0, 1, 2, 3, 4A, 4B and 5 occurred in 622 (35%), 327 (18%), 211 (12%), 165 (9%), 221 (12%), 42 (2%) and 181 (10%) patients respectively. Patients classified as CAC-DRS 3 were at an increased risk of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction compared to CAC-DRS 0 patients (hazard ratio (HR) 9.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.24, 27.31; p < 0.001). Patients with higher CAD-RADS categories were at an increased risk of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, with patients classified as CAD-RADS 4B at the highest risk compared to CAD-RADS 0 patients (HR 19.14; 95% CI 4.28, 85.53; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with higher CAC-DRS and CAD-RADS scores were at increased risk of subsequent fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction. This confirms that the classification provides additional prognostic discrimination for future coronary heart disease events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Stable chest pain (n=1,769). CAD-RADS and CAC-DRS standardized reporting classifications (highest risk: CAD-RADS 4B and CAC-DRS 3) vs. CAD-RADS 0 and CAC-DRS 0 was evaluated on Five-year events of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction (HR 19.14, 95% CI 4.28-85.53, p=<0.001). Higher CAD-RADS and CAC-DRS scores strongly predicted 5-year fatal or non-fatal MI.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: