Why the study?
Patients with ESRD on dialysis were excluded from HFrEF trials, leaving scant data and unclear hyperkalemia risks regarding MRA use in this population.
Does mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use improve clinical outcomes safely in patients with HFrEF and end-stage renal disease on dialysis?
Does mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use improve clinical outcomes safely in patients with HFrEF and end-stage renal disease on dialysis?
Despite current guidelines recommending against MRA use in chronic kidney disease, limited evidence suggests potential clinical benefits with low risk in ESRD patients on dialysis.
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are known to have a proven mortality benefit in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) without kidney disease. As patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring either peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis were excluded in clinical trials of HFrEF, the data are scant on the appropriate use of MRAs in this population. The unknown efficacy, along with concerns of adverse effects such as hyperkalemia, has limited the willingness of clinicians to consider using MRAs in these patients. However, it is unclear whether the risk of hyperkalemia is present if a patient is oliguric or anuric. Current guidelines recommend against the use of MRAs in patients with chronic kidney disease, but do not address the use of MRAs in patients requiring dialysis. This article will review the epidemiology of heart failure in ESRD, the pathophysiological derangements of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in patients with kidney disease, and the results from case series and trials of the use of MRAs in ESRD with HFrEF. Although limited to several small trials using MRAs in peritoneal and hemodialysis patients with or without HFrEF, the current literature appears to show the potential for clinical benefits with little risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhinder et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: