Why the study?
Molecular mechanisms underlying ischemic cardiomyopathy remain relatively understudied due to marked phenotypic heterogeneity, making it essential to define the sarcomeric proteoform landscape.
Top-down proteomics reveals severe dysregulation of the sarcomere contractile apparatus, including altered phosphorylation of key proteins, in end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Sarcomeric proteoform landscape now mapped in ICM; leaves open mechanistic roles and therapeutic relevance.
Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is a prominent form of heart failure, but the molecular mechanisms underlying ICM remain relatively understudied due to marked phenotypic heterogeneity. Alterations in post-translational modifications (PTMs) and isoform switches in sarcomeric proteins play important roles in cardiac pathophysiology. Thus, it is essential to define sarcomeric proteoform landscape to better understand ICM. Herein, we have implemented a top-down liquid chromatography (LC)–mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics method for the identification and quantification of sarcomeric proteoforms in the myocardia of donors without heart diseases ( n = 16) compared to end-stage ICM patients ( n = 16). Importantly, quantification of post-translational modifications (PTMs) and expression reveal significant changes in various sarcomeric proteins extracted from ICM tissues. Changes include altered phosphorylation and expression of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and enigma homologue 2 (ENH2) as well as an increase in muscle LIM protein (MLP) and calsarcin-1 (Cal-1) phosphorylation in ICM hearts. Our results imply that the contractile apparatus of the sarcomere is severely dysregulated during ICM. Thus, this is the first study to uncover significant molecular changes to multiple sarcomeric proteins in the LV myocardia of the end-stage ICM patients using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS)-based top-down proteomics. Raw data are available via the PRIDE repository with identifier PXD038066.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chapman et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: