Echo-Doppler and Clinical Evaluations to Define Hemodynamic Profile in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: Accuracy and Influence on Therapeutic Management

BACKGROUND: Correct classification of chronic heart failure (CHF) patients by dual evidence of congestion and adequate perfusion is the primary clinical focus for management. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of echo-Doppler compared with clinical evaluation in determining the hemodynamic profile of patients with CHF; and to compare therapeutic changes based on hemodynamic or echo-Doppler findings. METHODS: Three hundred and sixty-six consecutive CHF patients (ejection fraction 25+/-7%) in sinus rhythm, undergoing evaluation for cardiac transplantation, underwent physical examination prior to right heart catheterization and echo-Doppler studies. Subsequently, patients were randomized to therapeutic optimization using either right heart catheterization or echo-Doppler data. The end-points were: identification of low cardiac output (cardiac index <2.2 l/min/m(2)); high pulmonary wedge pressure (PWP >18 mm Hg); high right atrial pressure (RAP >5 mm Hg) and analysis of therapeutic changes made in response to the right heart catheterization and echo-Doppler studies. RESULTS: Echo-Doppler showed better accuracy in estimating abnormal hemodynamic indices than clinical variables (cardiac index <2.2 l/min/m(2): echo positive predictive accuracy (PPA) 98% vs. clinical PPA 52% p<0.00001; PWP >18 mm Hg: echo PPA 85% vs. clinical PPA 76% p=0.0011; RAP >5 mm Hg: echo PPA 82% vs. clinical PPA 57% p<0.00001). When applied to individual patients, the echo-Doppler assessment was more accurate than clinical evaluation in defining the different hemodynamic profiles: wet/cold (89% vs. 13%, p<0.0001); wet/warm (73% vs. 30%, p<0.0001); dry/cold (68% vs. 12%, p<0.0001); dry/warm (88% vs. 51%, p<0.0001). Therapeutic decision-making based on echo-Doppler findings was similar to that based on hemodynamics. CONCLUSION: Echo-Doppler hemodynamic monitoring proved accurate in estimating hemodynamic profiles and influenced therapeutic management.