Why the study?
Does nipradilol prevent renal injury in the 5/6 nephrectomized rat model compared to propranolol?
Does nipradilol prevent renal injury in the 5/6 nephrectomized rat model compared to propranolol?
Nipradilol, a beta-blocker with a nitric oxide-generating function, provides renoprotection in a rat model of glomerulosclerosis independent of its blood pressure-lowering effects.
BACKGROUND: The L-arginine-nitric oxide (NO) pathway plays an important role in the modulation of glomerular disease. We investigated whether beta-blocking agents, with and without an NO-generating function, had renoprotective effects in the 5/6 nephrectomized rats (Nx), an animal model of glomerulosclerosis. METHODS: Nipradilol, a beta-blocker with an ONO(2) group (5, 10 or 15 mg/kg/day) and propranolol, a beta-blocker without this group (50 mg/kg/day) were administered for 12 weeks to Nx together with and without nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). We evaluated the effects of both drugs on proteinuria, hypertension, renal function, glomerulosclerosis and urinary excretion of NO metabolites (U(NOx)) and cyclic GMP (U(cGMP)). RESULTS: Both drugs similarly attenuated the elevated blood pressure in Nx. However, nipradilol, at doses of 10 and 15 mg/kg/day, significantly decreased proteinuria and glomerulosclerosis, while propranolol did not. Nx showed reduced U(NOx) in comparison with the sham-operated rats. Nipradilol increased U(NOx) and U(cGMP) significantly and in a dose- dependent manner, whereas propranolol reduced them to levels lower than those in Nx. Nx receiving L-NAME reduced U(NOx). The addition of nipradilol increased U(NOx) and decreased urinary protein excretion and glomerulosclerosis, suggesting that the NO released from the drug contributed to its renoprotective effect. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that nipradilol exerts its renoprotective effect through NO generation, and not by lowering blood pressure. The beta-adrenergic blocking action per se does not seem to be related to the renoprotective effect of these agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takamitsu et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: