What question did this study set out to answer?

Assess the clinical benefits and limitations of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring relative to conventional sphygmomanometric measurements.

February 1, 1989American Journal of Hypertension

Clinical Use of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Why the study?

Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring provide superior diagnostic and prognostic accuracy compared to cuff blood pressure measurement in patients with or suspected of having hypertension?

Key Points

Assess the clinical benefits and limitations of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring relative to conventional sphygmomanometric measurements.
Evaluation of physician-induced alerting reactions and blood pressure elevations during clinical cuff measurements.
Comparison of intra-arterial and noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data regarding organ damage and diagnostic fidelity.
Physician-administered measurements trigger an alerting reaction that inflates blood pressure readings, introducing error into clinical hypertension evaluations.
Mean 24-hour and daytime blood pressure levels correlate more closely with hypertensive target organ damage than office sphygmomanometry, but prospective evidence proving prognostic superiority is insufficient.
Noninvasive ambulatory monitoring exhibits limited accuracy due to frequent artifactual readings and suboptimal agreement with intra-arterial standards, alongside undefined thresholds for normal values.

Structured PICO

Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring provide superior diagnostic and prognostic accuracy compared to cuff blood pressure measurement in patients with or suspected of having hypertension?

Population

Subjects with normotension, borderline or mild hypertension, or suspected pheochromocytoma

Intervention

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (intra-arterial and noninvasive)

Comparator

Sphygmomanometric (cuff) blood pressure measurement

Outcome

Accuracy of blood pressure estimation and prognostic value for target organ damagesurrogate

At the time of publication, widespread clinical use of noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was not advocated due to accuracy limitations and insufficient prospective prognostic evidence compared to standard cuff measurements.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Cautions against routine noninvasive ABPM use over cuff BP; leaves open need for prospective validation of improved devices.

Cite This Study

G. Mancia (1989) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a73b5465946a55bc0fb7727 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/2.2.50s

Topics

Hypertension management

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Clinical Use of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

Key Points

Structured PICO

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Topics

Clinical Use of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

Key Points

Structured PICO

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Topics

Also Consider