Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This communication defends the Hygia Chronotherapy Trial by emphasizing its organizational strengths and the clinical value of 48-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and bedtime chronotherapy in primary care.
The participating doctors of the Hygia Chronotherapy Trial (HCT) are aware of the criticisms of its published findings, which have been unjustifiably misrepresented in letters to the editors and commentaries, perhaps because of lack of understanding of the foundations of the Hygia Project, in which the HCT is nested. Thus, our purpose through this communication is to highlight the unique features of the Hygia Project and HCT in terms of: (i) organization, management, and quality control, (ii) physician training/continuing medical education, and (iii) impact on every-day primary-care clinical practice specifically improved patient care through 48 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to diagnose and optimally manage by bedtime hypertension chronotherapy true arterial hypertension to markedly improve the cardiovascular health of our patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crespo et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: