Why the study?
Does the presence of carotid atherosclerotic plaques bias the measurement of pulse wave velocity and central pulse waveform variables assessed by carotid tonometry?
Does the presence of carotid atherosclerotic plaques bias the measurement of pulse wave velocity and central pulse waveform variables assessed by carotid tonometry?
Carotid tonometry measurements of pulse wave velocity and central hemodynamics are reliable and not significantly biased by the presence of local carotid atherosclerotic plaques.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Carotid stenosis does not bias cf-PWV or tonometry readings; leaves open need for larger validation before protocol changes.
OBJECTIVE: Aortic stiffness and central pressure measurements have become increasingly important for the overall estimation of cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study is to verify whether the presence of stenosis in the carotid arteries due to atherosclerotic plaques may induce a bias in the measurement of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) and in the analysis of central pulse waveform variables assessed by carotid tonometry. METHODS: Eighty-four patients (age: 67.1 ± 12.4 years) undergoing screening for carotid atherosclerosis were enrolled, divided into three groups according to carotid ultrasound findings (NASCET criteria): 28 patients without significant stenosis, 30 patients with bilateral plaques, and 26 patients with right or left monolateral stenosis. PWV and other variables derived from the central pulse waveform analysis (central blood pressure, augmentation index and forward and backward waves) were measured at both right and left carotid arteries by a validated PulsePen tonometer. A repeatability study was performed in 28 young healthy patients (age: 25.4 ± 2.9 years). RESULTS: A high degree of correlation was found between bilateral measurements in all groups, and particularly in groups with monolateral carotid stenosis, with no significant difference attributable to lateralized stenosis. Right-left differences in asymmetric groups were 0.35 ± 5.12 mmHg (R = 0.960) for central blood pressure, -2.12 ± 7.39% (R = 0.743) for augmentation index, 0.64 ± 1.56 m/s (R = 0.947) for PWV, 0.08 ± 8.48 mmHg for forward wave (R = 0.742) and 0.35 ± 2.35 mmHg for backward wave (R = 0.907). CONCLUSION: Measurement of PWV and of variables derived from the central pulse waveform analysis by carotid tonometry is not biased by the presence of local atherosclerotic plaques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grillo et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: