Why the study?
Hypertensive retinopathy indicates hypertension control and risk for cardiovascular events and stroke mortality, making early detection crucial.
Nearly half of hypertensive patients in a tertiary care setting exhibited hypertensive retinopathy, highlighting the critical need for regular fundoscopic screening and medication adherence to prevent target organ damage.
High retinopathy prevalence supports routine screening in hypertensives; leaves open whether detection improves long-term outcomes.
Background: Hypertensive retinopathy in a population indicates the level of hypertension control and risk for cardiovascular events and a 10-year risk of stroke mortality. So early detection of retinopathy is crucial for various reasons. Methodology: This study was conducted on 300 patients without known retinal problems included by convenient sampling method in the hypertension clinic at a tertiary care facility in Chennai from August to December 2021. Data was gathered using a questionnaire by in-person interviews and dilated fundoscopic examination. The Chi square test and the Fischer's exact test were used for associations. Results: The average age of the participants was 59.13 (±9.7) years. 188(62.7%) participants had hypertension for less than five years and 13.3% had regular eye check. The prevalence of retinopathy is 49.3%. In which 28%, 17.3%, 4% had Grade 1, Grade 2, Grade 3 respectively. Patients with hypertension more than 5 years, non-compliance to medications, not doing regular blood pressure check, being employed in non-professional occupation, with history of ocular pain and impaired vision had significant association with retinopathy. Conclusions: As the study had half the hypertensive patients with retinopathy, it is imperative to provide comprehensive health education and prioritize regular screening for retinopathic changes among hypertensive patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tamilarasi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: