Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 7, 2004Journal of Internal Medicine

Statistical issues in interpreting clinical trials

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Design

Review

Authors

DDDavid L. DeMets

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Clinicians should scrutinize trial results for statistical pitfalls; leaves open refinement of methodological standards in research.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

David L. DeMets (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a73dbe50e7fa2a8810dd6fchttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01320.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Trials and Tribulations2003 · 94 citations
  2. 2Clinical trials: Design, conduct, and analysis2019 · 34 citations
  3. 3Randomized controlled trials – a matter of design2016 · 240 citations
  4. 4Randomized Clinical Trials in Surgery1989 · 15 citations
  5. 5Disciplined analyses in clinical trials: the dark heart of the matter2007 · 13 citations