Why the study?
Does a single dose of Sabin attenuated type 1 poliovirus vaccine spread, elicit serological response, and remain genetically stable in children in a semi-closed community?
Does a single dose of Sabin attenuated type 1 poliovirus vaccine spread, elicit serological response, and remain genetically stable in children in a semi-closed community?
This study outlines the objectives to evaluate the spread, excretion, serological response, and genetic stability of the Sabin type 1 poliovirus vaccine in a semi-closed community.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sets study objectives for Sabin type 1 vaccine behavior; leaves open empirical data on spread, response, and stability.
The desirable properties of a live poliovirus vaccine are that it should be of attenuated neurovirulence, be genetically stable during growth in the human intestine, and so be safe for the vaccinated individual and the community. It should moreover be able to infect the alimentary tract readily, and elicit an antibody response after such infection (W.H.O., 1960). Although the vaccine viruses developed by Sabin appear to possess most of these qualities, it is known that intestinal passage may give rise to some variation. Nevertheless, no serious consequences have been reported amongst the 100 millions or so that have now received Sabin attenuated vaccine in many parts of the world. A small- scale study with the Sabin type 3 virus has already been reported from Shefflield (Clarke et al., 1958), and the present trial was performed with type 1 vaccine to obtain information about: (1) the spread, within a poliovirus- free semi-closed community, after infection of a number of children with a single dose of living type 1 polio- virus vaccine; (2) the degree and duration of virus excretion; (3) the serological response to vaccination; and (4) the genetic stability of the vaccine virus strain on passage through the human gut. The virus used was the living, attenuated, L Sc, 2ab type 1 vaccine developed by Sabin, and received from him in 1959 in the form of infected monkey-kidney-tissue culture fluid. Since 1959 it had been stored at -70C.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoskins et al. (1962) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: