Exploratory case study assesses ecotourism adaptability in three zones, suggesting tailored management strategies.
This exploratory case study assesses ecotourism adaptability across three zones within the proposed Southwest Karst National Park (Guangxi), where UNESCO-recognised geological heritage intertwines with diverse ethnic cultures. To fill the gap in zone-specific integrated assessment frameworks, we employed a two-stage entropy-weighted TOPSIS method—calibrated via Delphi-AHP adjustments within a Social-Ecological Systems framework—using 2023–2024 data, complemented by ethnographic observations. Preliminary results indicate divergent trajectories: the Tiankeng zone exhibits high geological uniqueness and market appeal (composite score 0.74); the Mulun zone shows relatively balanced social–ecological coupling (0.58); and the Underground River zone displays pronounced asymmetry between vulnerability and development potential (0.16). Accordingly, tentative daily visitor caps of 3000, 8000, and 14 persons, respectively, and a pilot adaptability alert threshold of 0.20 for this specific case are proposed. These findings reveal a “vulnerability–capacity inverse matching” dynamic, informing differentiated governance: high-adaptability zones may allow moderate tourism with real-time monitoring, whereas low-adaptability zones require strict conservation-first measures and phased institutional capacity-building prior to any development. This preliminary framework offers actionable insights for sustainable management, conceptually aligned with SDG 11.4 and SDG 15.9.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: