Why the study?
Recent studies have used basic epicardial adipose tissue assessments to predict risk of atherosclerosis-related MACE, motivating the creation of novel fat-omics features to capture EAT pathophysiology and improve prediction.
Does a novel "fat-omics" approach using epicardial adipose tissue assessments from CT calcium scores improve the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to traditional fat features?
Does a novel "fat-omics" approach using epicardial adipose tissue assessments from CT calcium scores improve the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to traditional fat features?
Novel radiomic "fat-omics" features of epicardial adipose tissue from routine CT calcium scores significantly improve cardiovascular risk prediction compared to basic fat metrics.
EAT fat-omics may refine MACE prediction; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Background: Recent studies have used basic epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) assessments (e.g., volume and mean HU) to predict risk of atherosclerosis-related, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Objectives: Create novel, hand-crafted EAT features, "fat-omics", to capture the pathophysiology of EAT and improve MACE prediction. Methods: We segmented EAT using a previously-validated deep learning method with optional manual correction. We extracted 148 radiomic features (morphological, spatial, and intensity) and used Cox elastic-net for feature reduction and prediction of MACE. Results: Traditional fat features gave marginal prediction (EAT-volume/EAT-mean-HU/BMI gave C-index 0.53/0.55/0.57, respectively). Significant improvement was obtained with 15 fat-omics features (C-index=0.69, test set). High-risk features included volume-of-voxels-having-elevated-HU-[-50, -30-HU] and HU-negative-skewness, both of which assess high HU, which as been implicated in fat inflammation. Other high-risk features include kurtosis-of-EAT-thickness, reflecting the heterogeneity of thicknesses, and EAT-volume-in-the-top-25%-of-the-heart, emphasizing adipose near the proximal coronary arteries. Kaplan-Meyer plots of Cox-identified, high- and low-risk patients were well separated with the median of the fat-omics risk, while high-risk group having HR 2.4 times that of the low-risk group (P<0.001). Conclusion: Preliminary findings indicate an opportunity to use more finely tuned, explainable assessments on EAT for improved cardiovascular risk prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: