Key result
Recombinant hirudin in anuric hemodialysis risks severe bleeding from accumulation, requiring lower boluses and aPTT monitoring.
Case Report (n=1)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates risks of recombinant hirudin accumulation and severe bleeding in haemodialysis, highlighting the need for dose adjustments and activated partial thromboplastin time monitoring.
Heparin is at present the most widely used anticoagulant for haemodialysis to prevent clotting in the extracorporal circuit. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II is a serious complication rendering the further administration of unfractioned heparin as well as low-molecular-weight heparin impossible. Even available heparinoids such as danaparoid exhibit a significant cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies in 5–10% of patients and is sometimes not suitable for anticoagulation in cases of heparin intolerance. Hirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor which forms non-covalent complexes with thrombin. In contrast to heparin it does not require endogenous cofactors. Chronic administration of r-hirudin in haemodialysis carries the risk of accumulation since unchanged hirudin is exclusively cleared by the kidney [1]. It is not removed by haemodialysis. To avoid cumulation and bleeding complications in anuric patients dose reduction has been suggested (bolus of 0.02–0.17 mg/kg prior to each haemodialysis) followed by careful monitoring with the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) [2–5].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Müller et al. (1999) conducted a case report in Haemodialysis with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II (n=1). Recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin) was evaluated on Serious bleeding. Recombinant hirudin in haemodialysis carries accumulation and serious bleeding risks in anuric patients, prompting suggested reduced bolus doses of 0.02–/kg with aPTT monitoring.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: