Why the study?
Does the logistic EuroSCORE predict in-hospital mortality more accurately than the additive EuroSCORE in patients undergoing combined CABG and valve surgery?
Does the logistic EuroSCORE predict in-hospital mortality more accurately than the additive EuroSCORE in patients undergoing combined CABG and valve surgery?
The logistic EuroSCORE is more accurate than the additive EuroSCORE for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing combined CABG and valve surgery.
Logistic EuroSCORE offers better calibration than additive version after combined CABG-valve surgery; leaves open need for contemporary validation.
OBJECTIVE: To study the use of the additive and logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) to predict mortality following adult combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve surgery. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively, from all four centres providing adult cardiac surgery in the north west of England, on 1769 consecutive patients undergoing combined CABG and valve surgery between April 1997 and March 2002. Observed in-hospital mortality was compared to predicted mortality as determined by both additive and logistic EuroSCORE. RESULTS: Observed mortality for simultaneous CABG and valve surgery was 8.7%, compared to 6.7% (additive) and 9.4% (logistic). Sixty-five percent of patients were classified as high-risk (additive EuroSCORE >5); the observed mortality was 11.5%, compared to 8.1% (additive) and 12.8% (logistic). Discrimination was similar in both systems as measured by the C statistic (additive 0.73, logistic 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: The logistic EuroSCORE is more accurate at predicting mortality in simultaneous CABG and valve surgery, as the additive EuroSCORE significantly under-predicts in this high-risk group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karthik et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: