Key result
The provided text is a journal table of contents and does not contain the clinical paper requested.
Fibrinogen levels and pulse pressure are independent predictors of aspirin resistance in patients with stable coronary artery disease receiving 100 mg/day aspirin.
May aid identification of aspirin-resistant stable CAD patients; hypothesis-generating, requires prospective validation before clinical use.
OBJECTIVES: Aspirin is the cornerstone of antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular medicine. However, aspirin resistance has been demonstrated in 0.4% to 83.3% of aspirin-receiving patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of aspirin resistance using a modified thrombelastography (mTEG) method and related clinical and biochemical parameters in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), who received 100 mg/day aspirin. STUDY DESIGN: The study included 168 patients (115 males, 53 females; mean age 60±8 years) with stable CAD, receiving aspirin at a dose of 100 mg/day. Aspirin responsiveness was determined using mTEG, where aspirin resistance was defined as arachidonic acid-induced whole blood platelet aggregation inhibition (PAI) of less than 50%. RESULTS: Aspirin resistance was detected in 27 patients (16.1%). Platelet aggregation inhibition showed negative correlations with hyperlipidemia, smoking, spironolactone use, systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and total cholesterol and fibrinogen levels. In multivariate regression analysis, only fibrinogen level (OR=1.063, p=0.010) and pulse pressure (OR=1.197, p=0.023) were found to be independent indicators of aspirin resistance and PAI. In ROC analysis, cut-off values of 50 mmHg for pulse pressure and 400 mg/dl for fibrinogen level predicted aspirin resistance with 88.9% and 74% sensitivity and 64.4% and 68% specificity, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that measurements of fibrinogen level and pulse pressure may be used as easy and reliable methods in predicting aspirin resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Durmuş Yıldıray Şahin (2012) studied this question. The provided text is a journal table of contents and does not contain the clinical paper requested.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: