Key result
Higher acculturation is linked to ~2.5-fold higher diabetes prevalence in non-Mexican-origin Hispanics.
Why the study?
Is a higher level of acculturation associated with an increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes among Mexican-origin Hispanic, non-Mexican-origin Hispanic, and Chinese adults free of clinical cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,992)
Yes
Is a higher level of acculturation associated with an increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes among Mexican-origin Hispanic, non-Mexican-origin Hispanic, and Chinese adults free of clinical cardiovascular disease?
Greater U.S. acculturation is associated with more than double the prevalence of diabetes among non-Mexican-origin Hispanics—partially mediated by BMI and diet—highlighting the need to disaggregate Hispanic subgroups when assessing cardiometabolic risk.
Acculturation effects on diabetes warrant subgroup-specific investigation in Hispanics; leaves open causal and longitudinal implications.
OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes among Hispanic and Asian Americans is increasing. These groups are largely comprised of immigrants who may be undergoing behavioral and lifestyle changes associated with development of diabetes. We studied the association between acculturation and diabetes in a population sample of 708 Mexican-origin Hispanics, 547 non-Mexican-origin Hispanics, and 737 Chinese participants in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Diabetes was defined as fasting glucose >/=126 mg/dl and/or use of antidiabetic medications. An acculturation score was calculated for all participants using nativity, years living in the U.S., and language spoken at home. The score ranged from 0 to 5 (0 = least acculturated and 5 = most acculturated). Relative risk regression was used to estimate the association between acculturation and diabetes. RESULTS: For non-Mexican-origin Hispanics, the prevalence of diabetes was positively associated with acculturation score, after adjustment for sociodemographics. The prevalence of diabetes was significantly higher among the most acculturated versus the least acculturated non-Mexican-origin Hispanics (prevalence ratio 2.49 [95% CI 1.14-5.44]); the higher the acculturation score is, the higher the prevalence of diabetes (P for trend 0.059). This relationship between acculturation and diabetes was partly attenuated after adjustment for BMI or diet. Diabetes prevalence was not related to acculturation among Chinese or Mexican-origin Hispanics. CONCLUSIONS: Among non-Mexican-origin Hispanics in MESA, greater acculturation is associated with higher diabetes prevalence. The relation is at least partly mediated by BMI and diet. Acculturation is a factor that should be considered when predictors of diabetes in racial/ethnic groups are examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kandula et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes prevalence in asymptomatic middle-aged and elderly adults (n=1,992). Higher acculturation score (score 3-5 vs 0-1, based on nativity, years living in the U.S., and language spoken at home) vs. Least acculturated group (acculturation score 0-1) was evaluated on Prevalence of diabetes (defined as fasting glucose >=126 mg/dl and/or use of antidiabetic medications) among non-Mexican-origin Hispanics (PR 2.49, 95% CI 1.14-5.44, p=0.059 for trend). Higher acculturation was associated with significantly higher diabetes prevalence in non-Mexican-origin Hispanics (PR 2.49, 95% CI 1.14-5.44), but not in Chinese or Mexican-origin Hispanics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: