Key result
Alcohol septal ablation improved LVOTGs across all ages, but procedural complications were higher in elderly (20.8%) than young (9.1%) or middle-aged (6.3%) patients (P≤0.016).
Why the study?
Does alcohol septal ablation provide similar efficacy and safety in young, middle-aged, and elderly patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=360)
Does alcohol septal ablation provide similar efficacy and safety in young, middle-aged, and elderly patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
p-value: p=≤0.016
Alcohol septal ablation provides similar symptomatic and hemodynamic improvements across all age groups in obstructive HCM, though elderly patients face higher procedural complication rates.
Alerts clinicians to higher complication risk with alcohol septal ablation in elderly obstructive HCM patients; leaves open need for randomized age-stratified safety data.
OBJECTIVES: We compared the efficacy and safety of alcohol septal ablation (ASA) for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in young, middle-aged, and elderly patients. BACKGROUND: Intersociety guidelines suggest based on limited evidence that young patients with medically refractory symptoms of obstructive HCM should undergo surgical myectomy while elderly patients may be more appropriate for ASA. METHODS: Data for 360 patients undergoing 389 ASAs were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed according to age. RESULTS: Young (<45 years), middle-aged (45-64 years), and elderly (≥65 years) patients comprised 28, 40, and 32% of the study population, respectively. Young patients had thicker left ventricular septal walls at baseline, and elderly patients had more comorbidity and dyspnea. Resting, mean left ventricular outflow tract gradients (LVOTGs) were similar across the age groups at baseline (62, 66, and 68 mm Hg, respectively; P = NS for all comparisons). LVOTGs and dyspnea were significantly and similarly improved in all age groups immediately after ASA and through 12 months of follow-up (P < 0.001 for before and after comparisons; P = NS for intergroup comparisons). Complication rates were similar for young and middle-aged patients but higher for elderly patients (9.1 and 6.3% vs. 20.8%, respectively; P ≤ 0.016 for elderly vs. others). Mortality rates for young and middle-aged patients were lower than for elderly patients, but the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing ASA had significant and similar improvements in LVOTGs and symptoms regardless of age. Procedural complications were increased in elderly patients, who had numerically but not statistically significantly higher mortality rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leonardi et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (n=360). Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) vs. Compared across age groups (<45, 45-64, ≥65 years) was evaluated on Procedural complications (p=≤0.016). Alcohol septal ablation improved LVOTGs across all ages, but procedural complications were higher in elderly (20.8%) than young (9.1%) or middle-aged (6.3%) patients (P≤0.016).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: