Why the study?
Is heparin-spiked pooled plasma feasible for determining a therapeutic range for aPTT compared to patient samples?
Is heparin-spiked pooled plasma feasible for determining a therapeutic range for aPTT compared to patient samples?
Institutions should establish therapeutic aPTT ranges by calibrating against heparin concentrations from actual patient blood samples rather than using in vitro heparin-spiked plasma or traditional fixed ratios.
May not support in vitro heparin-spiked plasma for aPTT ranges; leaves open optimal ex vivo calibration methods.
The relationship between heparin concentration and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in pooled plasma was compared with that in patient samples to assess the feasibility of using heparin-spiked pooled plasma in determining a therapeutic range for aPTT. Blood samples were taken from 32 patients who had been receiving intravenous unfractionated heparin sodium for more than 24 hours. The samples were stored at -70 degrees C until anti-Xa assay within three months of collection. Pooled normal plasma was spiked with unfractionated heparin sodium to produce nominal anti-Xa concentrations of 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.5 unit/mL. Heparin concentrations and a aPTT values were measured, and the relationship between the two was determined by linear regression. For the ex vivo samples, the range of aPTT values corresponding to therapeutic heparin concentrations of 0.3-0.7 anti-Xa unit/mL was 64-106 seconds, which corresponds to an aPTT range of 2.3-3.9 times the mean of the normal range (compared with the traditionally defined therapeutic range of 1.5-2.5 times the control value). For the in vitro samples, the aPTT range corresponding to heparin concentrations of 0.3-0.7 unit/mL was 121-256 seconds, which corresponds to an aPTT range of 4.4-9.4 times the mean of the normal range. Each institution should establish a therapeutic aPTT range by calibrating aPTT values against heparin concentrations from blood samples of patients receiving intravenous heparin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Volles et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: