Key result
Both local and general anesthesia are valid alternatives for transcatheter aortic valve implantation, with strategies tailored to patient characteristics and procedural instances.
Both general anesthesia and local anesthesia with sedation are valid and feasible strategies for the anesthetic management of TAVI, each with specific advantages.
Supports individualized anesthesia choice in TAVI; leaves open prospective trials to guide selection.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an emergent technique for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. TAVI poses significant challenges about its management because of the procedure itself and the population who undergo the implantation. Two devices are currently available and marketed in Europe and several other technologies are being developed. The retrograde transfemoral approach is the most popular procedure; nevertheless, it may not be feasible in patients with significant aortic or ileo-femoral arterial disease. Alternatives include a transaxillary approach, transapical approach, open surgical access to the retroperitoneal iliac artery and the ascending aorta. A complementary approach using both devices and alternative routes tailored to the anatomy and the comorbidities of the single patient is a main component for the successful implementation of a TAVI program. Anaesthetic strategies vary in different centers. Local anaesthesia or general anaesthesia are both valid alternatives and can be applied according to the patient's characteristics and procedural instances. General anaesthesia offers many advantages, mainly regarding the possibility of an early diagnosis and treatment of possible complications through the use of transesophageal echocardiography. However, after the initial experiences, many groups began to employ, routinely, sedation plus local anaesthesia for TAVI, and their procedural and periprocedural success demonstrates that it is feasible. TAVI is burdened with potential important complications: vascular injuries, arrhythmias, renal impairment, neurological complications, cardiac tamponade, prosthesis malpositioning and embolization and left main coronary artery occlusion. The aim of this work is to review the anaesthetic management of TAVI based on the available literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monaco et al. (2012) conducted a review in Aortic stenosis. Anesthetic management of TAVI was evaluated. Both local and general anesthesia are valid alternatives for transcatheter aortic valve implantation, with strategies tailored to patient characteristics and procedural instances.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: