Key result
Sedation and local anaesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation were compared to general anaesthesia, though the abstract reports no quantitative results.
Why the study?
General anaesthesia carries risks that may be poorly tolerated in high-risk TAVI patients, prompting an evaluation of outcomes with sedation and local anaesthesia compared to general anaesthesia.
Does sedation and local anaesthesia improve outcomes compared to general anaesthesia in patients undergoing TAVI?
Does sedation and local anaesthesia improve outcomes compared to general anaesthesia in patients undergoing TAVI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review explores whether sedation and local anaesthesia offer better outcomes than general anaesthesia for high-risk patients undergoing TAVI.
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) has emerged over the last decade and has become a viable treatment option for those with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). The numbers of TAVI that are being performed in centres across the world is rising rapidly, and revolutionising treatment for AS and steering away from the need for open heart surgery. TAVI has been targeted for those who are deemed high risk to undergo open heart surgery such as the elderly, frail, or those with multiple co-morbidities. General anaesthesia (GA) has been used to facilitate TAVI especially when the procedure was in its infancy. The use of GA comes with its own set of risks such as haemodynamic compromise, risk for aspiration, longer procedure time and post-operative nausea and vomiting. These side effects and or complications may not be tolerated well in those who are elderly or have numerous co-morbidities. This article seeks to understand the outcomes of patients who undergo TAVI with the support of sedation and local anaesthesia (LA) in comparison to those who received GA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savarimuthu et al. (2021) conducted a review in Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Sedation and local anaesthesia (LA) vs. General anaesthesia (GA) was evaluated. Sedation and local anaesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation were compared to general anaesthesia, though the abstract reports no quantitative results.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: