Why the study?
Does non-recommended dosing of rivaroxaban increase adverse clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to recommended dosing?
Does non-recommended dosing of rivaroxaban increase adverse clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to recommended dosing?
Non-recommended dosing of rivaroxaban in atrial fibrillation is associated with worse crude outcomes, but this is largely driven by baseline patient characteristics rather than the dose itself.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-recommended rivaroxaban dosing flags higher-risk AF patients; leaves open whether dose or comorbidities drive outcomes.
AIMS: In Europe, the approved rivaroxaban dose for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is 20 mg once daily (o.d.), with 15 mg o.d. recommended in patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) 15-49 mL/min. Non-recommended doses are prescribed in real-world practice. This analysis of the XANTUS study assessed outcomes associated with non-recommended dosing and patient characteristics that may have impacted dose choice. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline characteristics and 1 year outcomes were compared in 4464/6784 patients with known CrCl, receiving recommended or non-recommended rivaroxaban doses; 3608 (80.8%) patients received recommended doses (mean CHADS2 score 1.9) and 856 (19.2%) non-recommended doses (mean CHADS2 score 2.5). Incidence rate (events/100 patient-years) for the composite of treatment-emergent adjudicated major bleeding, stroke/systemic embolism, and death was 7.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7-9.8] and 4.8 (95% CI 4.1-5.7) with non-recommended and recommended doses, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 1.55, 95% CI 1.2-2.1; P = 0.004]. Incidence rates for the components of the composite were 3.7 and 2.6, 1.4 and 0.9, and 3.5 and 1.9, respectively. Adjustment for baseline characteristics showed similar rates of the composite outcome (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.45; P = 0.719). Multivariable analysis identified age, anaemia, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, CrCl, lower body weight, AF type, and vascular disease as predictors of non-recommended dosing. CONCLUSION: Non-recommended rivaroxaban dosing was associated with less favourable outcomes, possibly due to baseline characteristics, in addition to renal function, that may also affect physicians' dosing decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01606995.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amarenco et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: