Why the study?
NVAF patients with creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min often receive less than the recommended rivaroxaban dose due to bleeding concerns, but the effect of under-dosing on safety and effectiveness remains unclear.
Does under-dosing rivaroxaban (10 mg vs 15 mg) increase thromboembolic events or reduce bleeding in Japanese patients with NVAF and CrCl ≥ 50 mL/min?
Does under-dosing rivaroxaban (10 mg vs 15 mg) increase thromboembolic events or reduce bleeding in Japanese patients with NVAF and CrCl ≥ 50 mL/min?
Under-dosing rivaroxaban in Japanese NVAF patients with CrCl ≥ 50 mL/min increases thromboembolic risk without significantly reducing major bleeding, supporting adherence to recommended dosing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Under-dosing may raise ischemic risk despite fewer bleeds; leaves open optimal real-world dosing strategies in Japanese NVAF.
The approved dose of oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in Japan is 15 mg once daily (od) in patients whose creatinine clearance is ≥ 50 mL/min, but recent real-world studies have demonstrated that these patients often received less than the recommended dose due to bleeding concerns. The effect of under-dosing on safety and effectiveness outcomes remains unclear. We used 1-year follow-up data from the XAPASS, a real-world Japanese prospective, single-arm, observational study. Of the 11,308 patients, 6521 patients who completed a 1-year follow-up and had a creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min were included in this sub-analysis. Primary endpoints were any bleeding and a composite of stroke/non-central nervous system systemic embolism (non-CNS SE)/myocardial infarction (MI). Among the 6521 patients, 4185 (64.2%; mean CHADS 2 score: 1.8) received the 15 mg od (recommended dose), whereas 2336 (35.8%; mean CHADS 2 score: 2.3) received 10 mg od (under-dose). After adjusting for patient characteristics by propensity scoring and inverse probability of treatment weighting, incidence rates of major bleeding were comparable between under-dosed patients and patients who received the recommended dose (1.34 vs. 1.63 events/100 patient-years, p = 0.197), although the incidence rates of stroke/non-CNS SE/MI were higher in under-dosed patients than in those who received the recommended dose (2.15 vs. 1.48 events/100 patient-years, p = 0.009). In Japanese clinical practice, some NVAF patients receive rivaroxaban doses inconsistent with the recommendation. Considering the total clinical benefit, the recommended dose may be preferable in terms of balance of safety and effectiveness. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01582737.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikeda et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: