Why the study?
RF RDN is guideline-recommended for uncontrolled hypertension, but its cost-effectiveness compared with optimal medical management in the Australian health care setting needed assessment.
Is radiofrequency renal denervation cost-effective compared with optimal medical management for the treatment of resistant hypertension in Australia?
Is radiofrequency renal denervation cost-effective compared with optimal medical management for the treatment of resistant hypertension in Australia?
Radiofrequency renal denervation is projected to be a cost-effective adjunctive treatment option for resistant hypertension in Australia, yielding meaningful clinical event reductions.
RF RDN is cost-effective in Australia; extends contemporary RCT data to support reimbursement and broader adoption.
AIM: Radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) is a guideline-recommended, minimally invasive therapy for patients with uncontrolled, including resistant, hypertension. This analysis assesses the cost-effectiveness of RF RDN compared with optimal medical management for treatment of resistant hypertension in the Australian health care setting on the basis of contemporary clinical data. METHOD: A previously published and validated decision-analytic Markov model was adapted to the Australian health care setting. Primary health states modelled included hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure), angina pectoris/coronary artery disease, end-stage renal disease, and all-cause mortality, with transitions among health states informed by multivariate risk equations. Costs (reported in 2025 Australian Dollar [AUD]$) and utilities were sourced from fee schedules and published literature. The base case modelled a resistant hypertension cohort, informed by registry data, in whom treatment with RF RDN reduced office systolic blood pressure by -5.2 mmHg, based on sham-adjusted results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED randomised controlled trial. The primary outcomes included 5-year clinical event rates, in addition to strategy-specific costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio over lifetime. Cost-effectiveness was assessed against an assumed willingness-to-pay threshold of AUD$50,000 per QALY gained. Costs and effects were discounted 5% per annum in accordance with Australian cost-effectiveness guidelines. Extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: At 5 years, RF RDN yielded meaningful reductions in clinical events (relative risks of 0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for myocardial infarction, and 0.71 for heart failure). Under the base-case assumptions, RF RDN was associated with incremental costs of AUD$10,396 and QALYs of 0.28, producing a lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of AUD$36,655 per QALY gained. RF RDN was shown to be cost-effective across the range of scenario and sensitivity analyses explored. CONCLUSIONS: Blood pressure reductions observed with RF RDN are projected to lead to meaningful clinical event reductions that render the therapy a cost-effective adjunctive treatment option for patients with resistant hypertension in Australia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schlaich et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: