Key result
Radiofrequency renal denervation proves cost-effective versus standard care at ~€6,800 per QALY gained.
Why the study?
Radiofrequency renal denervation is recommended as an adjunct option for uncontrolled and resistant hypertension, but its cost-effectiveness in the Dutch healthcare setting needed evaluation.
Is radiofrequency renal denervation cost-effective compared to standard of care for patients with uncontrolled and resistant hypertension?
Is radiofrequency renal denervation cost-effective compared to standard of care for patients with uncontrolled and resistant hypertension?
Effect estimate: ICER €6,784 per QALY gained
Absolute Event Rate: 17.49% vs 16.88%
Radiofrequency renal denervation is a highly cost-effective treatment option for uncontrolled and resistant hypertension in the Dutch healthcare system.
Supports modeling-based cost-effectiveness in the Netherlands; leaves open prospective validation in diverse real-world settings.
INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) has been recommended as an adjunct therapeutic option for uncontrolled including resistant hypertension. This analysis sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RF RDN treatment in the Dutch healthcare setting. METHODS: A previously published decision-analytic model was utilised to project outcomes over a lifetime horizon for RF RDN vs. standard of care (SoC). Data from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED study informed the cohort characteristics and base case treatment effect modelled (-4.9 mmHg office-based systolic blood pressure (oSBP) reduction vs. sham), while alternate assumptions were explored in sensitivity analyses. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated against a burden of disease-determined threshold of €20,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained, according to Dutch guidelines. RESULTS: In the base case, ten-year clinical event risk reductions were 0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for myocardial infarction, 0.89 for angina pectoris and coronary heart disease, 0.72 for heart failure, 0.96 for end-stage renal disease, and 0.93 for all-cause death. Over lifetime and under the base case effect size, RF RDN resulted in increased costs of €4,137 (€46,769 (RF RDN) vs. €42,632 (SoC)) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) of 0.61 (17.49 RF RDN vs. 16.88 SoC), with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €6,784 per QALY gained. RF RDN was highly cost-effective or dominant across the range of scenario and sensitivity analyses performed. CONCLUSION: Over lifetime, RF RDN was found cost-effective in the Dutch healthcare system, with an ICER substantially below the applicable willingness-to-pay threshold, while providing meaningful reductions in clinical events for uncontrolled including resistant hypertension patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daemen et al. (2025) studied Uncontrolled and resistant hypertension. Radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) vs. Standard of care (SoC) was evaluated on Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained (ICER €6,784 per QALY gained). Radiofrequency renal denervation was cost-effective compared to standard of care, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €6,784 per QALY gained over a lifetime horizon.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: