Key result
Catheter-based renal denervation compared to standard of care yielded an incremental QALY gain of 0.89 and an ICER of €1474, making it cost-effective for resistant hypertension in The Netherlands.
Why the study?
Is catheter-based renal denervation cost-effective compared to standard of care for patients with resistant hypertension in The Netherlands?
Is catheter-based renal denervation cost-effective compared to standard of care for patients with resistant hypertension in The Netherlands?
Effect estimate: ICER €1474
Catheter-based renal denervation is a highly cost-effective intervention for resistant hypertension in The Netherlands, with an ICER well below conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds.
May support consideration in Dutch resistant hypertension; extends economic models but leaves open randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVES: Safety and efficacy data for catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) in the treatment of resistant hypertension have been used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of this approach. However, there are no Dutch-specific analyses. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of RDN from the perspective of the healthcare payer in The Netherlands. METHODS: A previously constructed Markov state-transition model was adapted and updated with costs and utilities relevant to the Dutch setting. The cost-effectiveness of RDN was compared with standard of care (SoC) for patients with resistant hypertension. The efficacy of RDN treatment was modeled as a reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events associated with a lower systolic blood pressure (SBP). RESULTS: Treatment with RDN compared to SoC gave an incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain of 0.89 at an additional cost of €1315 over a patient's lifetime, resulting in a base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €1474. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) showed that treatment with RDN therapy was cost-effective at conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds (€10,000-80,000/QALY). CONCLUSION: RDN is a cost-effective intervention for patients with resistant hypertension in The Netherlands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henry et al. (2014) studied resistant hypertension. catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) vs. standard of care (SoC) was evaluated on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (ICER €1474). Catheter-based renal denervation compared to standard of care yielded an incremental QALY gain of 0.89 and an ICER of €1474, making it cost-effective for resistant hypertension in The Netherlands.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: