Key result
Radiofrequency renal denervation proves cost-effective vs standard care for uncontrolled hypertension at ~139,000 SEK per QALY.
Why the study?
Radiofrequency renal denervation is a catheter-based therapy for uncontrolled hypertension, but its cost-effectiveness in Sweden needed evaluation.
Is radiofrequency renal denervation cost-effective compared to standard of care for uncontrolled hypertension in Sweden?
Is radiofrequency renal denervation cost-effective compared to standard of care for uncontrolled hypertension in Sweden?
Effect estimate: ICER SEK 139,280 per QALY gained
Model projections suggest radiofrequency renal denervation is a cost-effective therapy for uncontrolled hypertension in Sweden.
INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) is a catheter-based therapy for uncontrolled hypertension. This model-based analysis examined the cost-effectiveness of RF RDN in Sweden. METHODS: Clinical events, costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were projected over 10-year and lifetime horizons using a decision-analytic Markov model. Primary health states, included hypertension alone, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, other symptomatic coronary heart disease (CHD), heart failure (HF), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and death. Health state transitions were informed by multivariate risk equations. Clinical evidence from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial informed the treatment effect modelled (-4.9 mmHg reduction in office systolic blood pressure (SBP) vs. sham). The base case was conducted from the Swedish healthcare payer perspective. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER),RF RDN vs. standard of care (SoC), evaluated against an assumed willingness-to-pay threshold of SEK 500,000 per QALY gained. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: At 10-years, the relative risks with RF RDN were 0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for MI, 0.89 for CHD, 0.72 for HF, 0.96 for ESRD, 0.86 for cardiovascular death and 0.93 for all-cause death. Over lifetime, RF RDN led to incremental costs of SEK 63,136 (total costs SEK 497,498 vs. SEK 434,362) and incremental QALY gain of 0.45 (14.79 vs. 14.34), yielding an ICER of SEK 139,280 per QALY gained. RF RDN was cost-effective across all scenarios and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Model projections suggest RF RDN to be a cost-effective therapy for uncontrolled including resistant hypertension in Sweden based on contemporary clinical evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kahan et al. (2025) studied uncontrolled hypertension. Radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) vs. standard of care (SoC) was evaluated on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (ICER SEK 139,280 per QALY gained). Radiofrequency renal denervation was cost-effective compared to standard of care for uncontrolled hypertension over a lifetime horizon, yielding an ICER of SEK 139,280 per QALY gained.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: