Key result
Radiofrequency renal denervation projects as cost-effective for uncontrolled hypertension in Japan, adding ~0.36 QALYs.
Why the study?
Following recent clinical evidence from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED study, the cost-effectiveness of RF RDN in the Japanese healthcare system needed to be examined.
Is radiofrequency renal denervation cost-effective compared to sham for uncontrolled hypertension in Japan?
Is radiofrequency renal denervation cost-effective compared to sham for uncontrolled hypertension in Japan?
Radiofrequency renal denervation is projected to be a cost-effective treatment option for uncontrolled hypertension in Japan, with an ICER well below the standard willingness-to-pay threshold.
Radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) is a novel therapy for uncontrolled hypertension. In the recent sham-controlled SPYRAL HTN-ON MED study, office-based systolic blood pressure (oSBP) and nighttime BP were reduced significantly. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of RF RDN in the context of the Japanese healthcare system based on this latest clinical evidence. Clinical events, costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were projected using a decision-analytic Markov model adjusted to Japanese incidence data. Risk reduction in clinical events from changes in oSBP was calculated based on a published meta-regression of 47 trials of intentional hypertension treatment. Demographics and results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial (oSBP effect size -4.9 mmHg vs. sham) were utilized in the base case analysis. Additional scenarios were explored including the potential added benefit of improved night-time control. Costs were sourced from claims data and published literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against a cost-effectiveness threshold of ¥5 000 000 per QALY gained. RF RDN was projected to reduce clinical events (10-year relative risks: 0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for myocardial infarction, and 0.75 for heart failure). Over lifetime, RF RDN added 0.36 QALYs at the incremental cost of ¥923 723, resulting in an ICER of ¥2 565 236 per QALY gained. Under the assumption of added night-time benefit, the ICER decreased to ¥2 155 895 per QALY. Cost-effectiveness findings were robust across all tested scenarios. The findings of this model-based analysis suggest that RF RDN can provide meaningful clinical event reductions and is a cost-effective treatment option in the Japanese healthcare system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kario et al. (2024) studied Uncontrolled hypertension. Radiofrequency renal denervation vs. Sham was evaluated on Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY gained (ICER ¥2 565 236 per QALY). Radiofrequency renal denervation was projected to be cost-effective for uncontrolled hypertension in Japan, adding 0.36 QALYs at an incremental cost of ¥923,723 (ICER ¥2,565,236 per QALY gained).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: