Why the study?
Increased arterial stiffness during acute hyperglycemia is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but the type of carbohydrate that inhibits it is unknown.
Does isomaltulose prevent acute increases in arterial stiffness compared to sucrose in healthy middle-aged and older adults?
Does isomaltulose prevent acute increases in arterial stiffness compared to sucrose in healthy middle-aged and older adults?
Isomaltulose intake prevents the acute increase in arterial stiffness seen with sucrose ingestion, suggesting potential cardiovascular benefits for dietary programs in older adults.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Isomaltulose may blunt hyperglycemia-induced arterial stiffness versus sucrose; leaves open confirmation in larger trials.
Increased arterial stiffness during acute hyperglycemia is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but the type of carbohydrate that inhibits it is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of low-glycemic-index isomaltulose on arterial stiffness during hyperglycemia in middle-aged and older adults. Ten healthy middle-aged and older adult subjects orally ingested a solution containing 25 g of isomaltulose (ISI trial) and sucrose (SSI trial) in a crossover study. In the SSI trial, the brachial–ankle (ba) pulse wave velocity (PWV) increased 30, 60, and 90 min after ingestion compared with that before ingestion (p < 0.01); however, in the ISI trial, the baPWV did not change after ingestion compared with that before ingestion. Blood glucose levels 30 min after intake were lower in the ISI trial than in the SSI trial (p < 0.01). The baPWV and systolic blood pressure were positively correlated 90 min after isomaltulose and sucrose ingestion (r = 0.640, p < 0.05). These results indicate that isomaltulose intake inhibits an acute increase in arterial stiffness. The results of the present study may have significant clinical implications on the implementation of dietary programs for middle-aged and elderly patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kobayashi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: