Why the study?
Does Xinmailong injection added to routine treatment improve cardiac function in patients with chronic congestive heart failure?
Does Xinmailong injection added to routine treatment improve cardiac function in patients with chronic congestive heart failure?
Xinmailong injection added to routine treatment improves surrogate markers of cardiac function (LVEF, ventricular volumes, BNP) in patients with chronic congestive heart failure.
Supports adjunctive Xinmailong to improve surrogate cardiac function markers in chronic HF; extends RCT evidence for TCM injections.
OBJECTIVE: This study used gated myocardial perfusion imaging (G-MPI) to assess the clinical value of Xinmailong injection in chronic congestive heart failure (CHF). METHODS: A total of 102 CHF patients were randomly divided into the control group (n = 51) and the Xinmailong group (n = 51). Patients in the control group were routinely treated. Patients in the Xinmailong group were additionally treated with Xinmailong injection in addition to routine treatment. Before and 3 months after treatment, G-MPI was used to determine changes in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV). Fourteen days after treatment, changes in plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels were determined. RESULTS: Before treatment, there were no significant differences in LVEF, LVEDV, LVESV, and BNP levels between the two groups (all P > 0.05). After treatment, LVEDV, LVESV, and BNP levels were significantly lower, and LVEF was significantly higher in the Xinmailong group than in the control group (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Additional use of Xinmailong injection in addition to routine treatment improves cardiac function of CHF patients. Because of the safety and effectiveness of Xinmailong injection; this therapy should be promoted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: