Why the study?
Does Doppler color-flow imaging accurately assess left-to-right shunt size in patients with atrial septal defect compared to cardiac catheterization?
Does Doppler color-flow imaging accurately assess left-to-right shunt size in patients with atrial septal defect compared to cardiac catheterization?
Doppler color-flow imaging can accurately distinguish left-to-right shunt size in atrial septal defects, potentially guiding patient management without the need for invasive catheterization.
Color Doppler jet width may support noninvasive ASD shunt estimation; leaves open prospective validation before replacing catheterization.
Two-dimensional echocardiography and pulsed-Doppler studies have not proved to be reliable methods of assessing left-to-right shunt size in atrial septal defect. Doppler color-flow imaging displays the transatrial jet, providing a new dimension with the potential capability of quantifying left-to-right shunt size. Twenty-three patients with atrial septal defect were studied by color-flow imaging and cardiac catheterization. The defect size measured by two-dimensional echocardiography, the maximal color-flow jet width in the atrial septum, and the maximal color-flow jet area in the right atrium were correlated with cardiac catheterization-derived left-to-right shunt size. Correlation coefficients were 0.57 (p less than 0.01), 0.67 (p less than 0.001), and 0.65 (p less than 0.01), respectively. Atrial septal color-flow jet width distinguished patients with less than a 2:1 left-to-right shunt size ratio (eight patients, jet width less than 15 mm in in all) from patients with greater than a 2:1 left-to-right shunt size ratio (15 patients, jet width greater than 15 mm in all). These results indicate that Doppler color-flow imaging can distinguish left-to-right shunt size in atrial septal defect accurately enough to influence decisions with regard to subsequent patient management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pollick et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: