Why the study?
Does radionuclide ventriculography accurately detect and quantify left-to-right shunts in patients with atrial septal defect compared to oxymetric data?
Does radionuclide ventriculography accurately detect and quantify left-to-right shunts in patients with atrial septal defect compared to oxymetric data?
Radionuclide ventriculography provides a noninvasive, specific, and sensitive method for detecting and quantifying left-to-right shunts exceeding 30% in patients with atrial septal defects.
May support noninvasive shunt quantification in ASD; leaves open validation in larger prospective cohorts.
The present investigation was undertaken to assess a new scintigraphic method for the diagnosis of left-to-right shunts due to atrial septal defect based on the differing stroke volumes of left and right ventricles and to compare it with oxymetric data. Radionuclide ventriculography was carried out after injection of 20 mCi 99mtechnetium-labeled red blood cells. Time-activity curves were obtained from the left and right ventricular regions, and the ratio (A) of end-diastolic-end-systolic count rate differences for the left and right ventricles was calculated. The left-to-right shunt (in percent of the pulmonary flow rate) is then given as 100 X (1 - A/1.43; 1.43 being the previously determined mean value of A in 66 normal patients. In 16 patients with an atrial septal defect and/or partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection a correlation of r = 0.81 was found between those shunts determined by the scintigraphic method and those calculated by oxymetric data. The specificity of the method and the sensitivity in detecting left-to-right shunts exceeding 30% are high. The method is practical and already widely used for determination of ejection fraction end-diastolic volume and other factors. The combination of this technique with other methods for shunt diagnosis such as gamma-fit analysis may prove of special value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kress et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: