Key result
Complete resection (R0) significantly improved postoperative survival compared to incomplete resection (RR 3.21) in patients with primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma.
Why the study?
What are the prognostic factors predicting postoperative survival in patients with primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma?
Cohort (n=71)
No
What are the prognostic factors predicting postoperative survival in patients with primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma?
Relative Risk: 3.21 (95% CI 1.9–5.42)
p-value: p=0.000
Complete resection, tumor grade, age, postoperative metastasis, and ascites are significant predictors of survival in patients with primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma.
May support R0 resection in retroperitoneal liposarcoma; leaves open prospective validation of prognostic factors.
BACKGROUND: Liposarcomas, which represent 20% of all adult sarcomas, are the most common histological type of malignant soft tissue tumors. The aim of this study was to define the prognostic factors that predict the postoperative survival period for patients with primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma. METHODS: The clinical data and prognoses of 71 patients with primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma who were treated in the General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army of China between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2007 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: The primary tumor from each patient was resected; 54.9% (39/71) were deemed R0 resections, 31.0% (22/71) were R1 resections and 14.1% (10/71) were deemed R2 resections (palliative operations). The median follow up was 68 months (range: 1-160 months). Of the patients who received an R1 or R2 resection of their primary tumor, 96.7% (59/61) had tumor recurrence. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year recurrence-free rates were 77.0%, 29.8% and 19.7%, respectively. As of April 2013, 53 of the 71 patients had died from tumor recurrence. The overall 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates were 88.7%, 76.1%, 61.7%, and 30.4%, respectively. The factors that were significantly associated with prognosis in the univariate analysis were age (as a categorical variable) (P = 0.006), modus operandi (P = 0.000), histologic subtype (P = 0.000), tumor grade (P = 0.000), ascites (P = 0.000), postoperative metastasis (P = 0.000) and adjuvant therapy (P = 0.030). However, in the multivariate analysis, the modus operandi (P = 0.000), tumor grade (P = 0.006), ascites (P = 0.027), postoperative metastasis (P = 0.023) and age (as a categorical variable) (P = 0.002) were the only significant predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Complete resection remains the most effective method for treating liposarcoma. High grade, old age (≥ 60 years old), postoperative metastasis, and ascites predict poor prognoses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma (n=71). Complete resection (R0) vs. Incomplete resection (R1 or R2) was evaluated on Postoperative survival time (RR 3.21, 95% CI 1.90-5.42, p=0.000). Complete resection (R0) significantly improved postoperative survival compared to incomplete resection (RR 3.21) in patients with primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: