Key result
Northern China residence is linked to ~13 mm² larger carotid total vessel area than southern.
Why the study?
Differences in the characteristics of carotid atherosclerotic plaques between symptomatic subjects in northern and southern China using MRI had not been investigated.
Are there regional differences in carotid atherosclerotic plaque characteristics between symptomatic subjects in northern and southern China?
Cross-Sectional (n=119)
Single-blind
Yes
Are there regional differences in carotid atherosclerotic plaque characteristics between symptomatic subjects in northern and southern China?
Symptomatic subjects in northern China have significantly larger carotid vessel size and wall thickness compared to those in southern China, suggesting regional differences in cerebrovascular disease risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Regional carotid differences may inform China-specific risk models; leaves open causal factors and prospective outcome links.
Background and purpose To investigate differences in the characteristics of carotid atherosclerotic plaques of symptomatic subjects in northern and southern China using MRI. Methods Sixty-three subjects in northern China (mean age: 59.1±8.6 years, 45 men) and 56 subjects in southern China (mean age: 60.4±8.6 years, 38 men) were included. All subjects underwent carotid artery multicontrast vessel wall MRI. Plaque morphology, calcification, lipid-rich necrotic core, intraplaque haemorrhage, luminal surface disruption and high-risk plaque were measured and identified. All plaque characteristics were compared between subjects in northern and southern China using Mann-Whitney U test or χ 2 test. Results Compared with subjects in southern China, those in northern China had significantly greater areas for lumen (57.7±14.9 mm 2 vs 50.4±18.3 mm 2 , p=0.009), wall (38.4±13.1 mm 2 vs 31.9±11.7 mm 2 , p<0.001) and total vessel (96.1±20.2 mm 2 vs 82.4±22.7 mm 2 , p=0.001) and mean wall thickness (1.25±0.43 mm vs 1.13±0.40 mm, p=0.019). χ 2 analysis showed that subjects in northern China tended to have a higher prevalence of intraplaque haemorrhage (14.3% vs 5.4%, p=0.106) and high-risk plaque (20.6% vs 10.7%, p=0.140) than those in southern China, although these differences were not statistically significant (all p>0.05). Conclusion Subjects in northern China have significantly larger vessel size and may have a higher prevalence of vulnerable plaques than those in southern China. Our findings provide additional perspective to optimise the management of cerebrovascular disease in individuals in different regions in China. Trial registration number NCT02017756
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Symptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaques with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (n=119). Residence in Northern China (Heilongjiang) vs. Residence in Southern China (Guangdong) was evaluated on Mean carotid total vessel area (mm2) (MD 12.94 mm2, 95% CI 5.24 to 21.51, p=0.001). Subjects in northern China had significantly larger carotid total vessel area (96.1 vs 82.4 mm2, p=0.001) and wall area (38.4 vs 31.9 mm2, p<0.001) than those in southern China.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: