Why the study?
Does continuous normothermic perfusion improve myocardial maintenance compared to intermittent hypothermic or normothermic perfusion in isolated canine hearts?
Population
Isolated, cross-perfused canine hearts
Comparison
Continuous normothermic coronary perfusion vs Intermittent hypothermic and intermittent…
Design
Preclinical
Follow-up
2 hours
Authors
Loading...
Continuous normothermic perfusion shows promise in canine models; leaves open clinical translation pending human studies.
Does continuous normothermic perfusion improve myocardial maintenance compared to intermittent hypothermic or normothermic perfusion in isolated canine hearts?
Continuous normothermic perfusion provides better myocardial maintenance than intermittent perfusion, though moderate hypothermia ameliorates the effects of intermittent ischemia.
Brown et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: