Key result
Case report evaluates D-dimer testing for suspected pulmonary embolism in an elderly cancer patient.
Case Report (n=1)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
D-dimer testing in elderly cancer patients with fever and low PE probability warrants caution; leaves open optimal thresholds for this subgroup.
An 82-year-old woman with bladder cancer and treated hypertension was referred by her family physician after she reported experiencing a few days’ history of mild fever, cough, limited deep inspiration, and left-sided pleuritic chest pain. She had no personal or family history of venous thrombosis and did not have any recent surgery, trauma, or admission to hospital. Her long-term medications included fluoxetine, vitamin D, and hydrochlorothiazide. On examination, temperature was 38.3°C (101°F), blood pressure was 157/78 mm Hg, pulse rate was 82 beats per minute, and respiratory rate was 20 breaths per minute. Oxygen saturation was 97% in room air. She had a regular heart rate with a mild systolic murmur; her jugular venous pressure was normal; and lung auscultation revealed reduced air entry at the left base. She had no leg swelling and no pain on calf palpation. Laboratory testing results are reported in Table 1. The attending physician raised the diagnosis of a pulmonary embolism (PE) among the differentials. The clinical probability of PE was unlikely (Wells score).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gal et al. (2015) conducted a case report in Suspected pulmonary embolism (n=1). D-Dimer testing was evaluated. D-dimer testing was evaluated in an 82-year-old woman with bladder cancer, fever, and pleuritic chest pain who had an unlikely clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: