Why the study?
Does acute administration of tezosentan improve cardiac and renal hemodynamics in rats with experimental congestive heart failure?
Does acute administration of tezosentan improve cardiac and renal hemodynamics in rats with experimental congestive heart failure?
Dual endothelin receptor blockade with tezosentan improves both cardiac and renal hemodynamics in an experimental model of congestive heart failure.
Supports endothelin blockade investigation in experimental heart failure; leaves open clinical translation.
Congestive heart failure (CHF) is commonly associated with renal dysfunction. The goal of the current study was to evaluate the role of endothelin in the renal dysfunction of experimental CHF by using tezosentan, a potent dual endothelin receptor antagonist. Rats were subjected to coronary artery ligation. Cardiac and renal hemodynamics were assessed after 3-5 weeks, when CHF had developed. Compared with control rats, CHF rats had significantly higher left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), lower mean arterial pressure, and reduced dP/dt(max). CHF rats had severe renal vasoconstriction, as assessed by increased renal vascular resistance (RVR, p < 0.001), decreased renal plasma flow (RPF, p < 0.001), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR, p < 0.001). Filtration fraction rose (p < 0.001). Urine flow rate and sodium excretion were markedly lower. Acute administration of tezosentan induced a marked decrease in LVEDP without change of dP/dt(max) and heart rate. Tezosentan decreased RVR (-43%, p < 0.001) and increased RPF and GFR. Filtration fraction decreased slightly. Tezosentan also increased urine flow rate and sodium excretion. These findings demonstrate that endothelin at least partly mediates the altered renal hemodynamics associated with experimental CHF. Dual endothelin receptor blockade could be useful for the improvement of both cardiac and renal function in CHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiu et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: