Key result
Peak hs-cTnT values differed significantly by surgical approach, with the highest medians observed in combined surgery (1067.5 ng/L) and multiple-valve HeartPort groups (1166 ng/L).
Why the study?
Biomarker cut-offs for perioperative myocardial infarction are controversial and unvalidated for non-CABG surgery, while minimally invasive approaches are thought to cause less myocardial damage than conventional surgery.
Does minimally invasive cardiac surgery compared to conventional surgery affect high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T release in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Observational (n=400)
Does minimally invasive cardiac surgery compared to conventional surgery affect high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T release in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T release varies significantly depending on the cardiac surgical approach, highlighting the challenge of differentiating expected surgery-related necrosis from perioperative myocardial infarction.
Higher hs-cTnT peaks after combined and multiple-valve HeartPort surgery may reflect greater injury; leaves open whether approach affects outcomes.
After cardiac surgery, a certain degree of myocardial injury is common. The arbitrarily proposed biomarker cut-off point in the Third Universal Definition for diagnosing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)–related perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI) is controversial and unvalidated for non-CABG surgery. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is often thought to be associated with less myocardial damage compared to conventional surgical approaches. We conducted a real-life prospective study with serial sampling of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) in patients undergoing conventional and minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Four different types of cardiac surgery were performed in 400 patients (February 2014–January 2015): CABG, aortic valve replacement, minimally invasive mitral/tricuspid valve surgery through the HeartPort (HP) technique and combined CABG/valve surgery. Each group was further subdivided for comparison between the different surgical techniques. Blood samples were collected consecutively at intensive care unit (ICU) admission and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 48 h thereafter. The hs-cTnT values by peak timepoint differed significantly depending on the surgical approach. The overall peak timepoint for hs-cTnT occurred 6 h after ICU admission. The combined surgery and multiple-valve HP groups had the highest values (medians of 1067.5 (744.9–1455) ng/L and 1166 (743.7–2470) ng/L, respectively). The peak hs-cTnT values for patients developing PMI showed high variability. Differentiation between cardiac surgery–related necrosis and PMI remains challenging. This study emphasizes the importance of a clinically reliable biomarker cut-off value in addition to electrocardiography and echocardiography to optimize PMI diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mey et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Cardiac surgery (n=400). Surgical approach (conventional vs minimally invasive) vs. Different surgical approaches was evaluated on Peak hs-cTnT values. Peak hs-cTnT values differed significantly by surgical approach, with the highest medians observed in combined surgery (1067.5 ng/L) and multiple-valve HeartPort groups (1166 ng/L).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: