Why the study?
Refractory VT and electrical storm often involve hemodynamic compromise needing mechanical support, prompting a review of VA-ECMO use during VT ablation.
Does venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provide safe and effective hemodynamic support in adult patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation?
Does venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provide safe and effective hemodynamic support in adult patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation?
VA-ECMO is used infrequently for hemodynamic support during VT ablation, with a 15% short-term mortality and 1-6% rate of major complications, highlighting the need for further data on patient selection and procedural optimization.
VA-ECMO support during VT ablation remains infrequent; leaves open optimal patient selection, procedural details, and outcomes.
Refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) and electrical storm are frequently associated with hemodynamic compromise requiring mechanical support. This study sought to review the current literature on the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for hemodynamic support during VT ablation. This was a systematic review of all published literature from 2000 to 2019 evaluating patients with VT undergoing ablation with VA-ECMO support. Studies that reported mortality, safety, and efficacy outcomes in adult (>18 years) patients were included. The primary outcome was short-term mortality (intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, or ≤30 days). The literature search identified 4,802 citations during the study period, of which seven studies comprising 867 patients met the inclusion criteria. Periprocedural VA-ECMO was used in 129 (15%) patients and all were placed peripherally. Average inducible VTs were 2-3 per procedure and ablation time varied between 34 mins and 4.7 hours. Median ages were between 61 and 68 years with 93% males. Median duration of VA-ECMO varied between 140 minutes and 6 days. Short-term mortality was 15% (19 patients), with the most frequent causes being refractory VT, cardiac arrest, and acute heart failure. All-cause mortality at the longest follow-up was 25%. Major bleeding, vascular/access complications, limb ischemia, stroke, and acute kidney injury were reported with varying frequency of 1-6%. In conclusion, VA-ECMO is used infrequently for hemodynamic support for VT ablation. Further data on patient selection, procedural optimization, and clinical outcomes are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vallabhajosyula et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: