Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a stratified treatment approach on automatic office blood pressure, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, and blood pressure variability in treatment-naïve patients with systolic hypertension using lercanidipine for stage 1 and lercanidipine/enalapril for stage 2.
Does a stratified approach with lercanidipine or lercanidipine/enalapril reduce blood pressure in treatment-naïve patients with stage 1 or 2 systolic hypertension?
Does a stratified approach with lercanidipine or lercanidipine/enalapril reduce blood pressure in treatment-naïve patients with stage 1 or 2 systolic hypertension?
A stratified treatment approach using lercanidipine and lercanidipine/enalapril significantly reduces office and ambulatory blood pressure in treatment-naïve patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension.
May support stratified lercanidipine use in naive hypertensives; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
Purpose: To describe the efficacy of a stratified approach on automatic office blood pressure (BP), 24-hour ambulatory BP, and BP variability (BPV) in treatment-naïve patients with systolic hypertension using lercanidipine for stage 1 and lercanidipine/enalapril for stage 2. Patients and methods: This was an open-label, prospective interventional study conducted in 22 general practices in South Africa. Treatment-naïve patients with stage 1 hypertension received lercanidipine 10 mg and patients with stage 2 received lercanidipine 10 mg/enalapril 10 mg. After 6 weeks, patients not reaching target (<140/90 mmHg) were up-titrated to lercanidipine 10 mg/enalapril 10 mg or lercanidipine 10 mg/enalapril 20 mg, respectively, for a further 6 weeks. Office BP was determined at each visit, and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitor (ABPM) at baseline and 12 weeks. The primary end point was changes in office BP, and secondary end points were changes in 24-hour ABPM and BPV. Results : Of the 198 patients, 48% had stage 1 and 52% stage 2 hypertension. The mean age was 55 years, body mass index was 29.2 kg/m2, 48.5% were female, and 15.1% were diabetic. The mean (SD) office SBP and DBP at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks was 158.2 (13.8), 141.6 (11.1), and 138.7 (16.7) mmHg ( P <0.00001), and 92.2 (10.6), 84.6 (11.1), and 82 (13.3) mmHg ( P <0.00001), respectively. The mean (SD) systolic and diastolic daytime ABPM at baseline and 12 weeks was 157 (16.63) and 142 (14.41) mmHg ( P <0.0001) and 88 (12.34) and 81 (10.79) mmHg ( P <0.0001), and the nighttime ABPM was 146 (15.68) and 133 (13.94) mmHg ( P <0.0001) and 79.5 (11.64) and 72.5 (10.05) mmHg ( P <0.009), respectively. There were few adverse events. Conclusion: Lercanidipine and lercanidipine/enalapril for stage 1 or 2 hypertension highly improves office SBP and DBP, overall 24-hour BP, daytime BP, and nighttime BP, also reducing BPV with few adverse effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brian Rayner (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: