Why the study?
Positive NIRS signals in areas lacking evident artery wall thickening are typically viewed as artefacts, and their utility to identify regions associated with increasing wall thickness was unknown.
Does the presence of NIRS-positive signals predict an increase in wall thickness in non-culprit coronary arteries of ACS patients?
Does the presence of NIRS-positive signals predict an increase in wall thickness in non-culprit coronary arteries of ACS patients?
NIRS-positive signals in otherwise non-diseased arterial walls identify regions prone to early plaque growth and should not be considered benign imaging artefacts.
Positive NIRS signals without thickening may predict future wall increase on serial imaging; hypothesis-generating and leaves open clinical utility.
BACKGROUND: Positive near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) signals might be encountered in areas without evident artery wall thickening, being typically perceived as artefacts. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the utility of NIRS to identify artery wall regions associated with an increase in wall thickness (WT) as assessed by serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: In this prospective, single-centre study, patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) underwent NIRS-IVUS and OCT assessment of a non-culprit artery at baseline and 12-month follow-up. For each vessel, 1.5 mm segments were identified, matched and divided into 45 sectors. The relationship between the change in IVUS-based WT (DWT) and the presence of NIRS-positive signals and OCT-detected lipid was evaluated using linear mixed models. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients (38 vessels, 6,936 matched sectors) were analysed at baseline and 12 months. A total of 140/406 (34.5%) NIRS (+) sectors and 513/1,575 (32.6%) OCT-lipid (+) sectors were found to be located in thin (WT<0.5 mm) wall sectors. In the thin wall sectors, an increase in WT was significantly more pronounced in NIRS (+) vs NIRS (-) sectors (0.11 mm vs 0.06 mm, p<0.001). In the thick wall sectors, there was a decrease in WT observed that was less pronounced in the NIRS (+) versus NIRS (-) sectors (-0.08 mm vs -0.09 mm, p<0.001). Thin wall NIRS (+) OCT-lipid (+) sectors showed significant wall thickening (DWT=0.13 mm). CONCLUSIONS: NIRS-positive signals in otherwise non-diseased arterial walls as assessed by IVUS could identify vessel wall regions prone to WT increase over 12-month follow-up. Our observations suggest that NIRS-positive signals in areas without evident wall thickening by IVUS should no longer be viewed as benign or imaging artefact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomaniak et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: