Why the study?
The prognostic role of MFR and MBF estimates obtained with dynamic CZT imaging in the development and progression of HFpEF in patients with nonobstructive CAD was unknown.
Does dynamic CZT imaging predict the development and progression of HFpEF in patients with nonobstructive CAD?
Does dynamic CZT imaging predict the development and progression of HFpEF in patients with nonobstructive CAD?
Reduced myocardial flow reserve on dynamic CZT imaging and elevated NT-proBNP independently predict the development and progression of HFpEF in patients with nonobstructive CAD.
Reduced MFR ≤1.62 on dynamic CZT imaging flags high-risk HFpEF progression; leaves open whether it guides therapy or improves outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the prognostic role of myocardial flow reserve (MFR) and myocardial blood flow (MBF) estimates obtained with dynamic cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) imaging in the development and progression of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) during a 12-month follow-up period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 112 patients (70 men; median age of 62.5 [57.0; 69.0] years) with nonobstructive coronary artery disease were enrolled in the study. Dynamic CZT-SPECT, echocardiography, and coronary CT angiography studies were performed baseline. RESULTS: Distribution of patients was performed by adverse events: group 1 comprised patients with adverse outcomes (n = 25), and group 2 comprised those without it (n = 87). Based on receiver operating characteristic analysis, the levels of MFR ≤1.62 (area under the curve [AUС], 0.884; Р < 0.001), stress-MBF ≤1.35 mL/min per gram (AUС, 0.750; Р < 0.001), and NT-proBNP ≥760.5 pg/mL (AUС, 0.764; Р = 0.001) were identified as cutoff values to predict adverse outcomes. Univariate analysis revealed that type 2 diabetes mellitus ( P = 0.044), the levels of MFR ≤1.62 ( P = 0.014), stress-MBF ≤1.35 mL/min per gram ( P = 0.012), NT-proBNP ≥760.5 pg/mL ( P = 0.018), and diastolic dysfunction ( P = 0.009) were potential risk factors for the development and progression of HFpEF. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the values of NT-proBNP ≥760.5 pg/mL (odds ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-3.62; P = 0.027) and MFR ≤1.62 (odds ratio, 2.801; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-6.55; P = 0.018) were independent predictors of adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that reduced MFR ≤1.62 obtained with dynamic CZT imaging and overexpression of NT-proBNP ≥760.5 pg/mL can individuate patients at high risk of development and progression of HFpEF during a 12-month follow-up period, independently of baseline clinical parameters and imaging variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kopeva et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: