Why the study?
Does selective ET-A or ET-B receptor blockade improve coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygen consumption in a canine model of pacing-induced heart failure?
Does selective ET-A or ET-B receptor blockade improve coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygen consumption in a canine model of pacing-induced heart failure?
ET-A receptor blockade increases coronary blood flow in a canine model of heart failure but does not increase myocardial oxygen uptake, suggesting ET-A-mediated vasoconstriction does not limit oxygen availability in the failing heart.
Circulating levels of the potent vasoconstrictor peptide endothelin-1 (ET-1) are increased in congestive heart failure (CHF). Coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) are decreased in some models of CHF. This study tested the hypothesis that ET-1 induced coronary vasoconstriction limits oxygen availability in the failing heart. The effects of selective ET-A receptor blockade with BQ610 (5 microg/min, intracoronary) and selective ET-B receptor blockade with BQ788 (5 microg/min, intracoronary) on coronary blood flow were examined at rest and during graded treadmill exercise in 8 dogs in which congestive heart failure (CHF) had been produced by rapid ventricular pacing for three to four weeks. In animals with CHF, ET-B receptor blockade caused no change in left ventricular (LV) pressure or coronary blood flow. In contrast, ET-A blockade with BQ610 resulted in modest significant increases of coronary blood flow at rest (from 22.4 +/- 2.1 to 27.9 +/- 3.0 mL/min) and during two exercise stages (from 26.9 +/- 2.0 to 30.7 +/- 1.9 during stage 1 exercise and from 28.5 +/- 2.0 to 31.7 +/- 1.3 mL/min during stage 2; all P < 0.05), with an upward shift in the relationship between coronary flow and rate-pressure product. The increase in coronary flow produced by ET-A blockade was not associated with an increase of either myocardial oxygen uptake or LV dP/dt. Thus, although ET-A receptor blockade caused a modest increase in coronary flow, this did not result in an increase of MVO2, implying that ET-A-mediated coronary vasoconstriction did not limit oxygen uptake by the failing heart.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hou et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: