This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
INTRODUCTION: Non-infectious uveitis encompasses a group of inflammatory eye diseases that can cause irreversible vision loss if left untreated or undertreated. In cases requiring stemic treatment, a step-wise treatment approach is often employed starting with corticosteroids for severe active disease, followed by initiation of steroid-sparing therapies to maintain inflammatory control and avoid the abundant complications of long-term corticosteroid use. AREAS COVERED: We review the current high-quality evidence comparing the efficacy of various systemic steroid-sparing agents in the treatment of non-infectious uveitis. For studies to be included, they had to have a prospective, randomized, comparative design or a retrospective design including at least 100 patients. EXPERT COMMENTARY: Given the rarity of uveitis and the heterogeneity of uveitic diseases, there are few randomized controlled studies that directly compare the relative efficacy of the various steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents. Therefore, current treatment strategies are based mainly on data from observational series.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knickelbein et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: