Why the study?
Does the absence of tPA or uPA affect the antithrombotic efficacy of a factor Xa inhibitor or a GPIIb/IIIa antagonist in a murine thrombosis model?
Does the absence of tPA or uPA affect the antithrombotic efficacy of a factor Xa inhibitor or a GPIIb/IIIa antagonist in a murine thrombosis model?
The antithrombotic efficacy of a GPIIb/IIIa antagonist, but not a factor Xa inhibitor, is highly dependent on the presence of endogenous tPA in a murine thrombosis model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
GPIIb/IIIa antagonist efficacy requires endogenous tPA in this murine model; leaves open relevance to human antithrombotic strategies.
To define the interaction of fibrinolytic components with platelets or coagulation factors on thrombus formation, we investigated mouse deficient in tissue plasminogen activator (tPA -/-) or urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA -/-) and in their wild-type control (tPA +/+, uPA +/+). A thrombus was induced in the murine carotid artery using photochemical reaction. Blood flow was monitored and the time needed before the vessel became completely obstructed was within 12 min in all types of mice. When DX-9065a, a selective factor Xa inhibitor, or GR144053, a platelet glycoprotein (GP) complex IIb/IIIa antagonist was applied, the time required to occlusion was prolonged in a dose-dependent manner in all types of mice. When a factor Xa inhibitor was injected in tPA -/- mice, the estimated ED50 was not changed. However, when GR144053 was injected in tPA -/- mice, the most significant changes were observed: the estimated ED51 was 19.6 times higher than the one in tPA +/+ mice. Platelet aggregation, hemostasis tests, and bleeding times were not significantly different among the different types of mice. In conclusion, the antithrombotic effect of platelet inhibition by a GPIIb/IIIa antagonist, is severely affected by the absence or presence of tPA production. On the contrary, the inhibition of factor Xa shows a stable antithrombotic effect with or without tPA. Thus the lack of tPA, but not of uPA, significantly affects antithrombotic efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishida et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: