Why the study?
Does long-term use of anticoagulants affect the incidence of major hemorrhage in patients with myocardial infarction treated in private practice?
Does long-term use of anticoagulants affect the incidence of major hemorrhage in patients with myocardial infarction treated in private practice?
This paper highlights the need to evaluate the incidence of major hemorrhage with long-term anticoagulant use in private practice, which may differ from rates reported in well-controlled studies at large medical centers.
Incidence of major hemorrhage with long-term anticoagulation in private-practice MI patients remains unclear; leaves open whether rates differ from controlled trials.
THE EFFICACY of anticoagulants in the treatment of myocardial infarction and in the postinfarction period is controversial.¹However, it appears likely that such therapy will be used for some time. The risks of anticoagulant therapy are relatively small, as determined in many well-controlled studies.² ⁻⁴The most important risk is major hemorrhage, the incidence of which was found to be 1.5% to 10% in both short²,³and long-term⁴,⁵usage. Most of the studies have been done in large medical centers. There have been very few reports from private practice, where the incidence of serious hemorrhage may be different. Pastor et al have suggested⁵that the statistics in well-controlled studies may not reflect the true incidence of hemorrhage or fatality, since the practicing physicians who administer most of the anticoagulants do not have occasion to publish their results. One of the most important factors in determining
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin H. Reinberg (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: