Why the study?
Does age at treatment (<40 vs >40 years) affect the likelihood of achieving diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg after correcting secondary hypertension?
Does age at treatment (<40 vs >40 years) affect the likelihood of achieving diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg after correcting secondary hypertension?
Correcting secondary hypertension at an early age (<40 years) is associated with a significantly higher likelihood of restoring normal blood pressure compared to treatment at an older age.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early correction of secondary hypertension was associated with normalized diastolic BP under age 40; leaves open whether age modifies response in prospective trials.
There is substantial evidence to show that correction of the causes of secondary forms of hypertension usually but certainly not always restores blood pressure to normal. We have analyzed the effect of age on the response of the blood pressure to the removal of the cause of hypertension in groups of patients with primary aldosteronism, renovascular hypertension, Cushing's syndrome and hypothyroid hypertension. In the patients studied, surgical or medical elimination of the mechanism responsible for the hypertension when the patients were below the age of 40 reduced diastolic blood pressure 1 to 2 years later to below 90 mm Hg in 24 of 25 patients. In the patients who were treated when they were over 40 years of age, blood pressure remained above 90 mm Hg after corrective treatment in 23 of 61 individuals (38%). In the 4 groups studied there was a significant correlation between age and post-treatment systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure. The findings indicate the importance of correcting secondary hypertension at an early age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Streeten et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: