Why the study?
Does isometric exercise cause different hemodynamic responses in patients with denervated versus innervated hearts?
Does isometric exercise cause different hemodynamic responses in patients with denervated versus innervated hearts?
Blood pressure increases during isometric exercise in both cardiac transplant recipients and nontransplant patients are driven by increased peripheral resistance rather than enhanced contractility or cardiac output.
Similar BP/TPR rises despite blunted HR in denervated hearts indicate peripheral resistance mediation; supports mechanism hypothesis but leaves open prospective confirmation.
Patients with cardiac denervation resulting from allograft transplantation have been observed to increase their diastolic and systolic blood pressure during isometric exercise without concomitant cardioacceleration. To determine the mechanism for the blood pressure increase, heart rate, blood pressure, and ventricular volumes (measured using fluoroscopy of tantalum midwall myocardial markers) were recorded before and after a 50% maximal voluntary contraction. Seven cardiac transplant recipients (denervated heart) and seven nontransplant patients (innervated heart) were studied. Innervated and denervated heart patients increased systolic blood pressure by 16% and 21% and total peripheral resistance by 20% and 12%, respectively. The percentage responses were not significantly different between groups, except for heart rate, which increased 17% in innervated heart patients and 2% in denervated heart patients (p less than 0.05). Neither group had enhanced contractility or increases in cardiac output, suggesting that the blood pressure increases resulted in both groups from increased peripheral resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savin et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: